Is this the world we live in?
I get irritated with the folks at my church sometimes when they talk of mission fields. I always laugh when they say people around the world need help. People need help right here. It may not be as sexy or inspiring to talk to about, but people right around the corner need help.
For the lack of a better term, the Texas Longhorns have become a mission field. They have voluntarily become that because the mission field is actually an income stream sorely needed by the university.
How you ask?
Texas and many other great academic institutions around the country like Michigan, UCLA, Virginia, Cal–Berkeley, USC, Texas A&M, Georgetown, North Carolina and Wisconsin have all decided to make their revenue producing sports their mission fields. They recruit these players to their universities because they understand the business of college sports and what it brings to the university setting.
They invite players to their campus and offer them an all expense paid stay when many times they are not academically, emotionally or socially prepared to deal with the college experience. Many of these players on their own academic merit have no business at his or her respective university, if being in college at all, but it’s about pleasing the ever demanding alumni and raising revenue through winning.
Only one school in the country will not have these issues creep up from time to time and that is Stanford. It has made a conscious decision to “suck” at the revenue producing sports. It can jump up every once in a while and field a competitive football team and maybe more often a basketball team because it doesn’t need the numbers but it won’t be able to do it consistently. Why? The Stanford Cardinal decided long ago that they would not lessen their academic standards to allow athletes into school. Everyone else has chosen to go for the money, the campus experience and the pride tied with football.
So as with any mission field, you get a mixed bag of results in hits and misses.
The hits of course are the things that I love. The kid shows up on campus and may have no business there but during the course of school the bell rings, the stop light turns green and the light comes on. The kid who probably had no business at the university gets his degree. Many times he is the first in a whole family to go to college. He probably marries a girl with a college degree and their kids are going to go to college. In that case, you have changed the course of a family. You have changed a generation and a last name. Even if a kid doesn’t graduate, he is much better off having been on a college campus for four or five years than if he had gone into the work force directly from high school.
If you are going to have the hits, you are going to have some misses. Misses are the kids that find their feet running into mischief and get into trouble. There are different kinds of trouble.
We would all be crazy to lump all of it into one bucket. The decision making process that goes, “I have had a few beers but I think I’m cool driving the short way home,” is totally different from the thought process that says, “Ya’ll ready. I got my gun. Let’s go do this.” One is poor decision making and one is poor character.
So what does a school do once it has decided this road for its athletic department?
Digging into the background even more and tightening the reigns on the recruiting process would be a start. The fear is that coaches that find themselves on the negative end of some press coverage usually make their recruiting standards even stricter and they take themselves out of the running for many of the premier athletes.
For football coaches, reigning in recruiting is only part of the answer because you have to deal with the 120 kids that are on campus right now. There are curfew options and team-wide sanction options.
They could move the players back on campus but that could cause uproar in on-campus housing.
At the end of the day, the coaching staff, the university and its support staff can do only so much to try and catch bad apples before they get in, because they are going to get in. At that point it becomes a management situation.
No matter who you pull for, problems are going to happen. You have to take the good with the bad because the schools have decided that winning and the football experience for the student body and the alumni are paramount. They have decided that the risk is worth allowing students into school that many times have no business being there. They have hitched their wagon to football, to the pageantry of the experience. As a genuine college football fan I am happy as I can be.
Something has to be done. The mission field is having problems all over the country with crime, drugs and inflated egos brought on by the media and the fans. The product is bringing in cash at an alarming rate so we know that change is not on the horizon. The revenue sports are too important to the vitality of the university.
As long as that is the case, you will have some hits and you will have some misses. Texas has surely had more hits than misses but the Texas staff has missed on a number of kids lately. Here’s to getting back on track. The mission field awaits.
October 1st, 2007 at 1:48 pm
I agree that texas has had more hits than misses when you talk overall numbers but I think that is only dealing with evaluating the player as he comes in to college. Can misses also be not developing the potential from the overly hyped overly ranked highschool players. i mean Mack Brown has been touted as Mr. February, the best recruiter in the nation. that was fun to believe that while I was at UT and myopicly invested in the program. But where are all the athletes at now? I know i know Im still told that texas has more talent that the other schools, but i cant believe it anymore. the best talent isnt a 2A highschool quaterback that couldnt get a sniff at other major college programs. The best talent doesnt have a letdown like this team has had since OU last year. Dont tell me we have better talent than other schools and sell me parody at the same time. The truth is the best talent is choosing the other schools at the last second or Mack decides that they cant handle UT even if they qualify for school. the talent sees that it isnt exciting to play for UT. Superman was exciting, the plays were generic. the truth is this is a playmakers offense and we never see playmakers on the field. they are either in jail or hidden on the bench(Benson vs OU, throw the damn ball to Roy vs OU, Simms vs major, back up qb’s vs preseason) . I heard mack say he thinks that Colt is struggling this year because as a freshman they took it easy on him with the playbook baby steps and now they open the playbook and usually sophmores struggle with learning the extra plays. I laughed out loud when I heard that. We only run 10 to 15 different plays, and his part seems to be zone read handoff or 2yard pass to build up a high completion percentage. He only runs playsout of shotgun why? he is too short to take steps and turn and see over the line, his arm motion is too low for his stature back there and he needs to be aided along to overcome his inabilities. The development at quarterback is why the talent has gone to other schools. even vince never improved his quarterback skills under mack. Vince just realized no college kid can tackle him, he told mack to sit back and let him take over. Listen to the titans they say his footwork had to improve not his arm. they say he had to learn how to takle snaps properly under center. The best colleges going are the ones that treat football as a major. you go to USC and your automatically ready for the nfl. you go to texas just as highly ranked out of highschool but you have to relearn all over again. kids see and hear this. They want to get better not barely beat Arkansas state, central florida, lose to k-state and then hear Mack say how good those players are and they could play for anybody in america. No, no, no they are at those places because no one else would take them. they just know they can outwork mack’s boys because mack coaches down now up. He said it himself he prefers close games to blowouts because the character built late in the game is worth it and correcting problems can become tougher for coaches if it looks too good. HUH? Hey mack Blow em out and kick their but in practice too. Make men out of them make champions out of them just quit bullshiting us. GO BE A CEO IF YOU WANT TO BE A CEO, I WANT A BALL COACH WITH SOME BALLS!
December 18th, 2007 at 6:22 am
I agree. I really liked the articles. Great insight by everyone here. Thanks! Sean thanks for everything your insight and your opinion. Like honesty and reality from articles and comments like these.
Thanks everyone.